(August 23, 2016 at 9:59 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:(August 23, 2016 at 9:27 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: The conclusion is only necessitated by the mounds of evidence for it. As I have said, we could find a species tomorrow with clear evidence for uncommon descent and it wouldn't invalidate the theory a bit, it would just mean there's another evolutionary tree. Btw, I don't blame you for avoiding trying to refute that point. It's awfully inconvenient to your assertions, after all, and pretty iron-clad, best to ignore it.
Good on you for finally making the slightest effort to be clear, you should be proud.
It's amazing how you guys cry poopy-pants about being misrepresented after you literally jump threads and change POV in which ever way most benefits your pre-conclusions. It's fine; I'll just link to the thread for anyone who is interested and has two hours of their life to waste reading 20 pages of your equivocating and conflation.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-44065-page-56.html
So it looks like what we have here are a couple of apologetics weasels.
