Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: October 1, 2024, 2:27 pm

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.

Violet Offline

Buffalo and Bee Lover

Religious Views: There are beeautiful cloud buffalo in the sky.

Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation: 145

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun.

May 15, 2011 at 12:51 am

(May 15, 2011 at 12:08 am)rumbuggerylash Wrote:
(May 14, 2011 at 11:08 pm)Rayaan Wrote: To some, religious texts are more fun.
To others, scientific literature is more fun.
Some find both interesting.

And now ... is that all you're asking us to answer? ... or are you just trolling here?

Are you a real Muslim or a faster than a lizard makes for its hole Muslim?

Rayaan is a both real Muslim and more talented sexually than you will ever be, as you will never bed a(nother) woman in your life, and no man would ever let you near his privates. Trolls tend to carry diseases such as 'poorcopulatoria' and 'badoralys'... and you seem to carry an advanced stage of 'stupidinsulticus'.

Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam

Where the dear and the strangers can play

Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word

But the skies are not stormy all day

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by rumbuggerylash - May 14, 2011 at 10:16 pm

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Rayaan - May 14, 2011 at 11:08 pm

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by rumbuggerylash - May 15, 2011 at 12:08 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Rayaan - May 15, 2011 at 12:49 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Violet - May 15, 2011 at 12:51 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by rumbuggerylash - May 15, 2011 at 1:19 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Violet - May 15, 2011 at 12:46 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Justtristo - May 15, 2011 at 12:49 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Cinjin - May 15, 2011 at 12:51 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Shell B - May 15, 2011 at 1:35 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by rumbuggerylash - May 15, 2011 at 1:57 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Shell B - May 15, 2011 at 2:01 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by rumbuggerylash - May 15, 2011 at 2:11 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Shell B - May 15, 2011 at 2:13 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by rumbuggerylash - May 15, 2011 at 2:28 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Shell B - May 15, 2011 at 2:59 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Violet - May 15, 2011 at 5:20 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by KichigaiNeko - May 15, 2011 at 5:24 am

RE: Scientific literature is too dry. Religious texts are more fun. - by Doubting Thomas - May 17, 2011 at 3:44 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Scientific/objective purpose of human species, may be to replicate universes	blue grey brain	6	1204	November 25, 2018 at 10:17 am Last Post: unfogged
	Intelligent Design as a scientific theory?	SuperSentient	26	6630	March 26, 2017 at 11:07 pm Last Post: SuperSentient
	Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?	theBorg	26	5095	August 18, 2016 at 8:17 pm Last Post: Edwardo Piet
	Fun with flat earthers.	Mechaghostman2	9	1920	July 26, 2016 at 12:11 pm Last Post: Mechaghostman2
	Questioning Scientific Titans	ScepticOrganism	19	3403	July 1, 2016 at 11:56 am Last Post: CapnAwesome
	Scientific Studies	IATIA	9	2076	May 11, 2016 at 7:48 pm Last Post: ignoramus
	The scientific version of good and bad	Detective L Ryuzaki	15	5407	August 31, 2015 at 12:39 am Last Post: Excited Penguin
	Scientific Adam and Eve	Won2blv	52	15369	June 22, 2015 at 10:57 am Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
	Scientific arguments for eating Organic/non-GMO food?	CapnAwesome	15	4441	June 10, 2015 at 6:49 pm Last Post: Pyrrho
	Having Fun With Evolution!	Platonic	40	8059	December 24, 2014 at 3:10 pm Last Post: Tonus

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me