(August 26, 2016 at 11:15 am)Rhythm Wrote: Our bodies don't work like a closed circuit bulb in any context...so I'm not sure how informative that analogy would be even if you could manage to string together a valid inference...which you failed to do regardless.
Is this the sort of stuff that your beliefs are based upon, Rik? Do you require these comments to be factually accurate or rationally valid, because if not...why bother (for either of us)? If you do require it, it would take all of twenty seconds or so to explain to you why you're wrong from every possible angle(and hey, don't take my word for it, you can look it up for yourself)...which is to say why your beliefs..dependent upon the truth of these statements, are wrong from every possible angle. Something tells me that you aren't interested in anything that might lead to the latter, which is why you didn't take the twenty seconds required to reach that conclusion....but I enjoy being wrong.
Could you answer two questions for me?
-How long can a person hold their breath?
-After exceeding that limit, how much longer until their brain has completely "shut down"?
Here's a third question, consider it a bonus, what is a "non-sequitur"?
Let wonder lead you to knowledge.
(try google)
You are a total joke Rit.

You ask me about the meaning of ......non sequitur........and then it is you that do not follow
the argument by comparing a death caused by a lack of breath with a death caused by totally different reasons in which the heart stop first.
Get real son.
In previous posts I already show expert reports in which the brain is unable to do absolutely nothing as soon as the heart stop sending blood and oxygen to the brain.
Are you more expert than the qualified expert?
You just fool yourself Rit.
