I have an electronic version of it. If you'd like, PM me an email address and I'll send it to you.
He does deal with this whole question of the "proto-orthodox" re-writing history because they were the eventual winners over the gnostic groups.
In his field, the jesus myth position is like a 3d rail. Much like "Atlantis" in archaeology, anyone who espouses either theory is reduced to the status of crackpot by the establishment. These guys, after all, have a financial interest in maintaining the jesus story for the dolts. The fact that Ehrman could not come up with any actual evidence either for his position suggested to me that he was merely going along with the herd.
He does deal with this whole question of the "proto-orthodox" re-writing history because they were the eventual winners over the gnostic groups.
In his field, the jesus myth position is like a 3d rail. Much like "Atlantis" in archaeology, anyone who espouses either theory is reduced to the status of crackpot by the establishment. These guys, after all, have a financial interest in maintaining the jesus story for the dolts. The fact that Ehrman could not come up with any actual evidence either for his position suggested to me that he was merely going along with the herd.
