RE: Donald, like Hilary, has taken millsions from Saudi
September 6, 2016 at 11:02 am
(This post was last modified: September 6, 2016 at 11:04 am by ReptilianPeon.)
So, Brian37, you think it's acceptable to sell military equipment to a country, and be chummy with them, known to give weapons to terrorists? Saudi what happens when DAESH gets statehood. In fact, if one compares Saudi to DAESH the Saudis get very angry. There was a story about that recently which I can't be bothered to find it now.
Saudi would fall without United States support because it is too tribal and needs strongmen to keep it together, kind of like Iraq under Saddam. Unlike, China the United States is, at least in part, responsible for the actions of Saudi because they are given political and military support by the United States. Western made bombs are being used to slaughter Yemini civilians, including schools for the blind and hospitals. Nowhere is safe in the Yemen.
The Clinton had a choice whether to show their support to human rights abuses by Saudi by giving all those speeches and they chose to give expensive speeches. It wouldn't be so much of a problem if the Clintons were consistent. Just listen to Hilary's rhetoric on Syria:
"Assad must go she says".
Yet at the same time Saudi is killing arguably more civilians than Assad, be it directly by dropping bombs, including US made cluster munitions banned under international law, or indirectly by giving weapons to groups like DAESH al-Qaeda.
Point is, the Oval Office has been inhabited by hypocrites for decades and Hilary will be know different. She loves the Saudi terror state because it makes her buddies the defence contractors very rich. Why is she only outraged by Syria not Saudi?
Saudi would fall without United States support because it is too tribal and needs strongmen to keep it together, kind of like Iraq under Saddam. Unlike, China the United States is, at least in part, responsible for the actions of Saudi because they are given political and military support by the United States. Western made bombs are being used to slaughter Yemini civilians, including schools for the blind and hospitals. Nowhere is safe in the Yemen.
The Clinton had a choice whether to show their support to human rights abuses by Saudi by giving all those speeches and they chose to give expensive speeches. It wouldn't be so much of a problem if the Clintons were consistent. Just listen to Hilary's rhetoric on Syria:
"Assad must go she says".
Yet at the same time Saudi is killing arguably more civilians than Assad, be it directly by dropping bombs, including US made cluster munitions banned under international law, or indirectly by giving weapons to groups like DAESH al-Qaeda.
Point is, the Oval Office has been inhabited by hypocrites for decades and Hilary will be know different. She loves the Saudi terror state because it makes her buddies the defence contractors very rich. Why is she only outraged by Syria not Saudi?
