Except I'm not trying to prove anything about historicity to you. As I have said, I'm agnostic on the matter. Surely you read that, right?
My point here, since you clearly still don't understand it, is that your own arbitrary standards for scholarship - dismissing those who don't agree with you as unscholarly - gives the strong appearance of bias on your part, and that does your point no favors.
My point here, since you clearly still don't understand it, is that your own arbitrary standards for scholarship - dismissing those who don't agree with you as unscholarly - gives the strong appearance of bias on your part, and that does your point no favors.