(September 13, 2016 at 2:17 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Convinced of what exactly? All the video shows, is that some bacteria survived and multiplied (it doesn't tell us anything about why or how).
Well, given that the bacteria didn't grow beyond the initial boundary, before rapidly spreading, does seem to suggest that they underwent some sort of change don't you think? Unless you think that there is another reason why the bacteria didn't grow on the antibiotic at first, but then suddenly were able to?
Quote:Also, I don't think that this is all that controversial. Bacteria have been resistant to antibiotics for millions of years.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22509370
Again, the video shows they weren't resistant to this particular antibiotic. If they were, they would not have stopped or even slowed down when they reached the agar that was in contact with it. The antibiotic prevented the bacteria from growing past it, until one of the bacteria developed a mutation which gave it resistance.
Quote:Again, I don't think what was shown here, is very controversial.
I agree, it's not controversial, because evolution is already accepted as scientific. However plenty of people do not believe in evolution.
