Evolution in action.

[Pat Mustard]

I don't quite get what you are trying to say, this post is incoherent even for you. But I think you are pointing to an article which demonstrates strong evidence for evolution and which comes to a conclusion that evolution is proven and uncontroversial (the issue is whether peppered moths evolved, twice, because of the advantages camoflague bestowed, or whether there were other selection criteria in play).

I have one superfluous word "then"....and because of that you can't make sense of it?

Seriously, does anyone else have a problem understanding what I wrote or is this guy just fucking with me again...?

And no, the article says the change in the moths is legit but more strict methods are needed to know if it was caused only by predation pressure.

No, I can't make sense of it based on the fact that you seem to be using an article which demonstrates strong proof for evolution in order to argue that it is false.