RE: Evolution in action.
September 15, 2016 at 9:15 am
(This post was last modified: September 15, 2016 at 9:15 am by Arkilogue.)
(September 15, 2016 at 8:11 am)Tazzycorn Wrote:Where did I argue that it's false? I said it was an interesting example of evolution. Are you projecting what you think I should be saying as a theist?(September 15, 2016 at 7:02 am)Arkilogue Wrote: I have one superfluous word "then"....and because of that you can't make sense of it?
Seriously, does anyone else have a problem understanding what I wrote or is this guy just fucking with me again...?
And no, the article says the change in the moths is legit but more strict methods are needed to know if it was caused only by predation pressure.
No, I can't make sense of it based on the fact that you seem to be using an article which demonstrates strong proof for evolution in order to argue that it is false.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder