Evolution in action.

[Pat Mustard]

No, I can't make sense of it based on the fact that you seem to be using an article which demonstrates strong proof for evolution in order to argue that it is false.

Where did I argue that it's false?  I said it was an interesting example of evolution. Are you projecting what you think I should be saying as a theist?

That's what I was wondering, I wasn't sure whether you were arguing that the article was a falsification of evolution or evidence for it. That's what you get though when your talk about science is incoherent, people have to double take when you actually agree with it.