(September 15, 2016 at 7:13 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote: That's what I was wondering, I wasn't sure whether you were arguing that the article was a falsification of evolution or evidence for it. That's what you get though when your talk about science is incoherent, people have to double take when you actually agree with it.
I never got enough information out of an Arkilogue quantum-bafflegab post to know whether he disagrees with science or not. It's rather like he raided a textbook for terms, loaded them in a shotgun, and then pulled the trigger.
A Gemma is forever.
