Question's for God.

[Angrboda]

This is your response to everything.  You're right because atheists are wrong.  That's nothing but an argument from ignorance, but it's the only argument you've got.
You return to it time and again.
I'm not the one replying to a request for evidence, dumbass.  I have no burden of proof here.  You do.  So your claim that I assume this is just pure misdirection, which appears to be the only intuitive science you're familiar with.  I don't 'assume' that these experiences don't reflect reality, I've simply been given no reason from you to believe that they do.   So you can take your tu quoque and shove it up your ass.  It's invalid, like so much of the rest of your shit.

Garbage yog.
If you............don't 'assume' that these experiences don't reflect reality.........then why you go to such an extent as to stubbornly search so many studies about NDEs that criticize them?
You do that because you refuse to acknowledge the authenticity of NDEs experiences because these would destroy your idea that there is no God.

If you're done psychoanalyzing me, you're full of it as usual.  I don't go to any great extent researching alternate explanations to NDEs.  What I do is note that you haven't substantiated your belief that they represent experience of a reality.  You can't seem to get it through your head that it's not my job to disprove NDEs, it's your job to prove them.  So far all you've done is assert that they have real content.  Assertions alone don't mean squat.  So of course you look to criticize me for your failure.  Tough shit.  You can't produce anything but a handful of veridical NDEs to support that the experiences are real.  When asked to produce evidence for your assertions, you produce a bunch of untrue generalizations about NDEs, and cherry pick which experiences you believe.  You're motivated by something other than the truth.  Otherwise why would you be distorting the evidence provided by people who study NDEs professionally.  If the evidence is there, why do you need to distort it?

You simply can't handle the truth that NDEs are evidence only that people have a memory of an experience, and that memory isn't necessarily based in reality, much as you'd like to believe "according to Yoga."

More garbage yog.

How could they not be based on reality when the evidence was there?
Here I refer to the description given by the person who had the NDE in which he-she saw what was happening while his-her dead body was lying in the casualty-emergency room with doctors and nurses trying to bring it back to life.
How could a dead body-brain witness what doctors-nurse were doing?

More garbage indeed, only it's you that's spewing the garbage.  You weren't asked for evidence that people can witness themselves being operated on from out of body.  You were asked to give evidence that karma and reincarnation are real.  A few unexplained OOBEs and your distortion and cherry picking of the accounts does not constitute evidence that karma and reincarnation are real anymore than they demonstrate a literal heaven and hell, which you don't believe in.  At no time during this whole discussion did you bring up veridical NDEs which are the best evidence that there is awareness during these near death experiences.  But they are only evidence of awareness during an NDE, not that all details of an NDE reflect reality.  In particular, they offer no evidence that karma and reincarnation are real.

People who take LSD have psychedelic experiences; their experiences aren't evidence of an altered reality.  You haven't given any reason for believing these experiences are 'real' other than "because you want to believe."  And even there you've been dishonest by believing certain NDE experiences "on the basis of Yoga," while discounting other equally prominent themes.  You're a wishful thinking, two-faced, folklore believing, red herring filled, cherry picking asshole.  And your so called "evidence" is nothing of the sort.
According to yoga.  *snort*

Fool.  

You don't even know what happen under the influence of drugs and yet you keep on speculating with no end in sight.
You keep on throwing judgment after judgment and then you say that you don't have to have the burden of proof.
You got to be nut yog.
Drugs act on the higher glands especially on the pineal gland which is the border between the physical reality and the spiritual reality.
By entering by force in the spiritual reality is possible to enjoy a form of distorted spirituality in which you can feel quite good but that lead to addiction and damage body-brain.  

This is another of your red herrings.  Instead of demonstrating the reality of these 'spiritual' experiences, you babble on with bare assertions about how drugs work.  You don't know.  You're just repeating religiously based dogma about the effect of drugs.  It has absolutely squat to do with demonstrating that these experiences are a part of reality.  It's just guessing and more bare assertions.  The point is you haven't demonstrated the reality of your spiritual dimensions, no matter what you blabber about the pineal gland.  

It is very bizarre how so many atheists don't get it.  
Those who smoke, drink or use some drugs search the God that they deny.
God is peace of mind.
God is happiness.
The above substances give just that.
Drugs give the God that they deny it exist.
How stupid is that?  

Blah, blah, blah.  More bare assertions and nary a bit of evidence.