(September 17, 2016 at 9:21 am)Little Rik Wrote:(September 16, 2016 at 3:01 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Yeah, "yog", how dare you search for critical analysis of unsupported assertions, instead of just swallowing them wholecloth?![]()
Stim.![]()
Yog has been constantly searching for ......... critical analysis of unsupported assertion.......for the last few years since NDEs experiences shake the core of atheism stubbornness with no success.
Now she changed tactic in the hope to have the last word considering that all those critics are just guessing.
Her new tactic is that I suppose to prove that NDEs are real.
I already did that but no the evidence is not enough.
She is asking for the evidence of the evidence of the evidence.
Isn't she smart?
You're a lying sack of shit. I ask you for evidence and you give me religiously based assertions. It must be karma. Why? It must mean reincarnation. Why? You don't have an answer. That isn't asking for evidence of the evidence. You haven't provided a reason for making the inferences that you make. Until you do, you've got nothing but bare assertions as to what these things 'mean'. Bare assertions aren't evidence, but that's all you've provided for karma and reincarnation. That some parts of a small handful of NDEs correspond to something real doesn't mean that all parts of all NDEs are real. What kind of an idiot are you for thinking that? The fact is, you don't. You cherry pick which aspects of NDEs to believe based on your religious presumptions. Well if you can do it, so can I.
NDEs are proof of a literal hell and a literal heaven. Therefore karma and reincarnation are false. Got a problem with that?
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)