(September 18, 2016 at 8:48 am)Jesster Wrote:(September 18, 2016 at 8:40 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: This is so important I want to quote it so it doesn't get lost. I have EXPERIENCED men who get their "moves" from porn, and I've had to patiently explain to the person how a lot of those things are for the visual stimulation of the MAN watching the movie, not for actually pleasuring the woman IN the movie. Porn presents such a distorted and inaccurate picture of mutual, pleasurable sex, it's laughable. Like...what is this business of the guy jack-hammering the girl's clitoris with his tongue like it's a punching bag?! (Was that too explicit? [emoji13] Sorry to the mods in advance!) Most porn willfully ignores the very basics of female sexual arousal and stimulation.
Guys...go at it all you want when it comes to porn; just please, don't extrapolate what you view to your IRL sexual partners. [emoji51]
Haha, this!
This brings me back to my comparison of porn to art. Just because you see it in an art museum, doesn't mean it should be repeated in reality. Keep it in the painting, please.
![[Image: Bosch-1.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn8.openculture.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F02%2F07201157%2FBosch-1.png)
Hahahahaha, that dude in the front has crows flying out of his butt! Is this a Salvador Dali? That guy was cray-cray. [emoji38]
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
