(September 18, 2016 at 10:36 am)Little Rik Wrote:(September 18, 2016 at 10:18 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: According to you, they are going to be reincarnated again anyway. So what's the purpose of sending them back? If you send them back, they get to work out their karma. If you don't send them back, they get reincarnated and get to work out their karma. You've given a reason that simply doesn't make sense. Why do they need to be sent back if they're going to be reincarnated?
I thought about it plenty. Enough to know that your answer was a bunch of twatwaffle.
Everyone is different because their karma is different.
For some one more life is enough to sort out their problems while for other is not so they will have to be reincarnated again and maybe again and again in order to sort out their many problems.
For other people that don't have any bad karma may even be reincarnated again and again.
What in hell does this have to do with whether being 'sent back' is pointless or not?
(September 18, 2016 at 10:36 am)Little Rik Wrote: Take an atheist that doesn't have any bad karma but refuse to believe in afterlife.
This person will not get to heaven until he-she start believing that there is an afterlife.
Why God would let these people go to heaven if they are not interested.
Still not answering the question.
(September 18, 2016 at 10:36 am)Little Rik Wrote: If they are happy to stay in a physical world for ever let them be in this physical world.
It is their choice and their free will.
First you explained that their being sent back was because of karma. Now you spend a whole post without answering the question.
Like I said, a bunch of twatwaffle. Your 'evidence' is looking like a pile of ad libbed excuses. Your excuses don't "make sense."
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)