(September 21, 2016 at 12:57 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:(September 21, 2016 at 12:54 pm)Drich Wrote: Your either confused as to the definition of unfalsfiable, or confused to the nature of the items being proven false in the statement.
The statement was proven to be 'false' we the subject said he prayed to God for a personal healing. Again the issue here is not God as the subject for falsifying, God (for the subject) was falsified in what he identified as the prayer. Therefore the subject matter, (what is being falsified) has turned to the method in which God was falsified. (The prayer.)
So first question, did the subject if fact make a prayer when asking for a healing? Answer? No. We have only one example of a Christian prayer and it does not include a provision or place to asked to be healed. therefore we can not identify what the subject did as a prayer, but a petition. The difference God has promised to always answer prayer in the affirmative, but has not promised to do anything with a petition.
We have been given direction if we seek healing from an affliction, and the subject did not follow the command given by Christ. Rather he sought to skip what the bible says do, in favor of a direct petition as it seems that as a new 'believer' he thought himself in a position to demand such a thing/Offer a trade a miracle for allegiance. This indivisual mistook what God had promised us, doesn't know the difference between a petition and prayer, tried to leverage his faith with a favorable outcome from a petition, and gives up on God because he didn't get his wishes granted.
So just in case your intelligence is getting in the way again..
God was falsified to this person in unanswered prayer.
I proved his statement to be false because his falsification process was mislabeled. He said he prayed when he did not. (even if he thought it was prayer it was only a petition which receive a negitive response almost without fail when one does not approach God on a subject that clear instructions have been given.)
Way to completely miss the point! Do you really think I give two shiny shits about your distinctions between prayer and petition?
And like always you missed mine...
God is 'falsified' through His promises. The one of the big one Jesus Himself promised is to ALWAYS answer prayer.
Can you see where I'm going with this Mr. Double major?
If your education is still getting in the way let me explain it to you as I would a child
IF God can be falsified through prayer/His promises then all one need do is find an unanswered prayer. Which is what rob-b seeming claimed. The problem? Most of you morons revel in your own ignorance concerning prayer. So much so they/you missed the whole point for both your and my argument? In that what he did was not pray but petition God.
Feeling stoo-ped enough to stop typing yet?