RE: Evolution in action.
September 25, 2016 at 4:56 pm
(This post was last modified: September 25, 2016 at 4:58 pm by Iroscato.)
(September 25, 2016 at 12:53 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(September 16, 2016 at 6:00 am)Tazzycorn Wrote: The only diiferences between macro and microevolution are whatever made up differences creatards ascribe to those two terms, because they created them in the Great Panda Shift of the late eighties in order to try and put on a scientific veneer and get creatardism taught in schools under intelligent design. Science does no use those terms, as while there are a number of mechanisms driving evolution, evolution itself is a single process.
And I am as skeptical of RRs claims to formerly accept evolution. There are gross mischaracterisations replete throughout RRs postings hers showing the only grounding he got in evolution was from a creatard perspective.
What specifically do you think that I am mis-characterizing about evolution?
Also, I don't accept name calling, attacking the person, or attacking the source, as an argument. And if there is no difference between micro evolution and macro evolution, then you should have no trouble demonstrating macro evolution correct? Hardly anyone denies that changes occur within the genetic population of a species over time. However; all time is going to gain you is an addition or multiplication of those changes seen within micro evolution. What evidence would you point to demonstrate that large scale systematic body plan changes occur to demonstrate macro evolution?
The Appendix, just off the top of my head. A redundant remnant of a time when humans had vastly different diets and lifestyles, whose only function now is to occasionally burst and kill the shit out of us.
![[Image: rySLj1k.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FrySLj1k.png)
If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM