(October 3, 2016 at 7:33 pm)Minimalist Wrote:(October 3, 2016 at 5:29 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Your definition seems fairly specific, I would almost say ad hoc! Is this your definition or an example?
Also, would you agree, that "magic" is beyond the bounds of evidence? If so.... why?
I gave you what you asked for. If you can't handle it, just admit it and we can move on.
You tell me. I don't accept the reality of "magic."
So then anything else is not magic then.... ok