(October 6, 2016 at 2:58 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:I have a logical model which predicts very specific geometric features within a universe. There will never be scientific/instrumental proof of what is outside of the universe or even outside of our tiny observable bubble within the universe. So I operate by plausibility while swinging Occam's Claymore.(October 6, 2016 at 2:49 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: You assume. I don't think they made the stories up nor are they authentic/literal. They are something else specifically crafted to be handed across time by primitive cultures. So primitive language was employed.
You really should look up the history and significance of the circumpunct.
Not assume, there has been no evidence of proof. Just blah, blah, blah. A tale, story, anecdote from antiquity when fantasy delusion was accepted as evidence.
Ya got some proof? Bring it.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder