DEBATE: Frodo Vs Kyu

[Kyuuketsuki]

Not established. See post 12

Is this another dodge?

God - Kyu refuses to discuss
Science - I have very little knowlede of, so couldn't discuss that
Evidence - We've discussed in some depth, and have reached several conclusions. Kyu denies these conclusions like he always does.

Firstly you could have fooled me because you have participated actively in several threads which have had science based content ... furthermore I wasn't actually talking about discussing the scientific method per se (although it may come up). Secondly I know a lot more about god/s than you want to admit and that you don't like what I say doesn't equate to a refusal to discuss the subject. Thirdly that we have discussed something already isn't the point; the point is the formalised discussion of the subject at hand and how a debate of that format will pan out.

All I can say is that I have a very good idea exactly how my first post will form up so I am very, very prepared to debate this subject ... if you are not then please feel free to suggest something else.

Can we have a comment thread?

I don't see why not.

Can I ask for no quoting of anything, just original thoughts of our own.

The rules/format I am devising wasn't going to be quite that strict but I was heading in that direction.

Current thoughts & no excerpts from the Kyu archives, for example.

Even though I wasn't planning on using my own material verbatim, I have to ask if that's fair? I mean my own archives, whilst comprehensive, are my own thoughts and are no different in principle than using one's own education and experience ... would I ask that you don't use anything you have learned?

Kyu