(October 18, 2016 at 2:12 am)Arkilogue Wrote: I have defined "GOD" repeatedly, several times, exactly the same way. An extant infinite absolute. A field of mass/matter that has no border and takes up all available space (saturate). What we have in the universe is voided space and matter in the form of atoms with mass that occupies 0.0000000000001% of the space of the atom and most of the total mass of the atom is in annihilating virtual particles.
So, your god is 99.9999999+% nothingness. What is the difference between your god and simple reality in the miniscule remainder? Can you actually speak to that?
(October 18, 2016 at 2:12 am)Arkilogue Wrote: You know exactly what "word" I am talking about, don't play dumb. Two places in major world wide religion that link the "word" (vibrational expression of an idea) to God: "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was God and the Word was with God." - Bible. "I am the Eternal...I am that which create the Word...I am the Word" Egyptian book of Coming Forth by Day.
I'm not playing dumb; I'm challenging you to go beyond woospeak. No need to get sore about it; if my replies bother you, hey, let me know, I'll shut up. But myself, it seems to me that you're caught between deism and Christianity, and don't really like being asked to peg out your tent.
(October 18, 2016 at 2:12 am)Arkilogue Wrote: The Word was "GOD". It was a self expression of observed self existence "I am that I am" "I am that which Is", "My name is Forever". It is also a pro-creative act by a living being because vibration creates form and space and life begets life. That is the symmetry break/quantum fluctuation that creates a finite God (manifestation of self expressive Oneness aka the "only begotten son"/God the Son/Word) and the space required to separate it from the original infinite.
See, when you start talking about symmetry break/quantum fluctuation that creates a finite God etc , my bullshit-detector starts klanging; such verbiage is in my experience a sign of someone pontificating for impression rather than expression. Big words don't impress me. Nebulous connections and stream-of-thought poesy is likewise unremarkable.
I'm actually asking you that since you have insight into the nature of this god you percieve, perhaps you could lay out your perceptions ... without the high-falutin' bullshit, preferably.
I'm a dumbass. Keep this shit simple, Swami.
(October 18, 2016 at 2:12 am)Arkilogue Wrote: Now that's all well and good for subjective consciousness but what about objective existence? What are the only objective spatial relationships that can be described of a substance that takes up all space forever? What are it's relativistic equalities? Will you/can you (yes you can) look through "GOD's" eyes with me?
I'll take a vinaigrette, thanks.
