RE: Supernatural Evidence?
October 18, 2016 at 7:46 pm
(This post was last modified: October 18, 2016 at 7:49 pm by Simon Moon.)
(October 18, 2016 at 7:04 pm)Soldat Du Christ Wrote: "You do know that the Muslims do the exact same thing with the Koran, right? Just google "scientific discoveries koran" or something similar. And their examples of the same thing you are doing are just as 'impressive', meaning, not at all."
Yeah, they where a stretch though, by alot. Nowhere near as clear as what the bible reveals.
Absolutely false.
Coming from someone that is completely outside both, Christian and Muslim, belief systems, your examples are no less stretching than the Koran versions.
You are just special pleading. Just one among several fallacies you are guilty of.
Quote:Also, the Koran says the bible is the inspired word of god. So if the koran was true,
That would make the bible true, and because the bible ia true, all other additions to scripture are false. Alot of you guys who like to write them all off as the same thing, realy don't understand the difference in relevence, historicity, revelation, prophecy, etc. But i expect as much.
Non sequitur. Another one of those pesky fallacies.
None of that is important to the claim both, Muslims and Christians make, about their texts containing scientific discoveries their cultures could have known about without the input from a god
Quote:You know i havn't been running around here arguing with everybody thinking i'd 'win some souls to the Lord', i fully expected some general dissmisal of what i have to say.
Offer bad evidence, expect dismissal of your unsupported assertions. That's the way it works when you are talking to people who care if their beliefs are true or not.
Here's a little pro tip: the Bible is not evidence, it IS the claim.
Quote:Now what i was and still am hoping for, are good reasons why all of my reasons are not justified. All i keep hearing is disbelief
Another failure of logic 101.
You are the one making the claim, you are the one that has the burden of proof. It's not our fault you continue to offer bad evidence.
[/quote]
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.