(October 18, 2016 at 8:08 pm)Jehanne Wrote:(October 18, 2016 at 2:58 pm)abaris Wrote: One growing back a limb would suffice. To prove the supernatural that is. Not to prove god. The one and only god you claim to be the one and only. Which is but one out of many. So not even if we were to give you the supernatural and it being a god's work, does it prove to be your scripted christian god of your denomination. Since even christians don't agree on one definition.
I'm an atheist, but if some amputee did have a completely restored limb, I would at least become a theist.
How would you go about discerning if a god was responsible?
How would you even go about proving it was a supernatural occurrence?
There are plenty of organisms that can regrow limbs. No one claims they do it with the use of the supernatural, or a god.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
