(October 24, 2016 at 12:24 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(October 24, 2016 at 10:39 am)Irrational Wrote: The common multiverse argument isn't that it is fine-tuned, but that among an infinite number of universes within the multiverse, there are bound to be universes with certain ranges of values that permit for human life just by "chance".
That is not exactly what I meant. If we live in a Multiverse then it is sufficiently fine-tuned to produce at least one physical universe in which life is possibly. This is like saying that if our universe is fine tuned the it produced at least one planet capable of supporting life.
No, it isn't/wouldn't be fine-tuned, lol. I do not understand your reasoning, imagine a monkey typing on a keyboard, give it infinite time and there's a possibility that it will write a whole game, think GTA V, or one of the big, complex games. It wasn't fine-tuned to write the game, though, it was just clicking the buttons randomly. That is similiar to the multiverse theory, if I am not wrong. We might need our physicist to confirm this. However, iirc I've heard that it's not 100% that the monkey will write a game, even given infinite time, you can look it up if you're interested.
