That quote was mine and not dagda's Kyu. Dagda said debate, and you said you had no time. Life overtook you but for a very short time, not enough to prevent you from debating. The question still stands.
I showed you why your 'resource bank' would be a problem Kyu. You seem to want to ignore the unfair playing field.
I have another thought. With the title of the debate (god(s), science & evidence), I'm going to have to argue the opposite of course, so you could rightly accuse me of straying from the debate topic. My response would be based around: God (singular), why science is only appropriate in the discussion theoretically, that it has no real relevance to the subject, (and the lack of evidence). If you have a problem with that then we need to sort this out beforehand I'd suggest.
I showed you why your 'resource bank' would be a problem Kyu. You seem to want to ignore the unfair playing field.
I have another thought. With the title of the debate (god(s), science & evidence), I'm going to have to argue the opposite of course, so you could rightly accuse me of straying from the debate topic. My response would be based around: God (singular), why science is only appropriate in the discussion theoretically, that it has no real relevance to the subject, (and the lack of evidence). If you have a problem with that then we need to sort this out beforehand I'd suggest.
