Supernatural Evidence?

[Huggy Bear]

I'm saying that each has their own distinct nature, but if that's too confusing for you, I can use an example of a woman who identifies as a cat and according to the society we've created, you can't tell her she's not...

Science can show that her brain is more similar to a human brain than a cat brain and provide a simpler explanation for why she thinks that she is a cat.

Science shows that transsexual brains are more similar to the gender that they claim to be and that they are not deluded in the same way.

A foetus never has a chance to become a cat in a womb whereas it always has a chance to become either male, female or somewhere in-between in different ways.


Science. It works, bitches.

*emphasis mine*
wrong...

https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...der-brain/

“Trans people have brains that are different from males and females, a unique kind of brain,” Guillamon says. “It is simplistic to say that a female-to-male transgender person is a female trapped in a male body. It's not because they have a male brain but a transsexual brain.” Of course, behavior and experience shape brain anatomy, so it is impossible to say if these subtle differences are inborn.

If you paid attention to the video, you'd see that the woman's brain was indeed different.

Another nail in your coffin would be those that are gender fluid, does their brain just morph back and forth between genders?

http://gender.wikia.com/wiki/Gender_Fluid

Gender fluid is a gender identity which refers to a gender which varies over time. A gender fluid person may at any time identify as male, female, neutrois, or any other non-binary identity, or some combination of identities. Their gender can also vary at random or vary in response to different circumstances. Gender fluid people may also identify as multigender, non-binary and/or transgender.

Gender fluid people who feel that the strength of their gender(s) change(s) over time, or that they are sometimes agender, may identify as gender flux.

But hey, it's nice to know you're also intolerant to the trans-specied community...

---

According to the society we've created I can't tell her she's not a cat? Hmmm... interesting.

Let me test that hypothesis.

She's not a cat.

Oh looks like there's a glitch in the system where at least I myself am able to call her not a cat. I wonder if I'm the only one with this glitch. I mean, I assume so. I presume no one else is able to tell her she's not a cat and I'm a one-off glitch because if everyone could tell her that she's not a cat then THAT would imply that Huggy is WRONG and he's NEVER wrong. Especially about Denmark... or some such shit.

I forgot I need to spell things out for certain mental midgets...

You can't tell her she's not a cat without being a hypocrite; got it?

So I must be some sort of special exception, a glitch in the Matrix. That woman is not a cat. Nano is not a cat. She's not a cat. Wow, it's easy!!! I'm unstoppable.

No, it's just that for you, hypocrisy is par for the course.

If we are talking legality, then legally a corporation is considered a person... what's  your point?

I gave you the medical definition, which defined a fetus as "unborn offspring", human offspring ARE children, but I see you opt to ignore medical definitions when it's convenient.

Just so were clear, are you saying that an unborn has no right to live? By what authority does one make this determination?

None of it changes the stupidity of being pro life.

It amuses me that you said I was trying to argue semantics but it's you who is arguing semantics.

Yes absolutely no right. It's the mother's decision.

So you admit that an unborn child has no rights and the mother can destroy it if she wants to...

That statement is why you're a hypocrite.

the bible is full of horror too. Does it not say In the OT  that if your child talks back to you, you should stone them to death?