(November 12, 2016 at 12:44 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(November 12, 2016 at 12:25 pm)ScienceAf Wrote: Yes, women are treated differently by some people but does make it so they don't have the same rights? No that's why feminism is not required.
Yeah, we're going to disagree on this one. Rights are abstract, but one only has them insofar as they are pratically present. Words on paper aren't rights.
(November 12, 2016 at 12:25 pm)ScienceAf Wrote: It started with addressing the problem with women's rights. Now it only does more harm.
"Only" does harm? I think you're overstating your case quite a bit. All it would take to falsify this claim of yours is to find one single instance where feminism has benefitted women.
Immoderate language rarely aids in making a point.
1) Can women not vote? Can women not go outside without a man? The words on paper are the framework of this government. That's why we had to change from the "Articles of Confederation" to the "Constitution".
2) I said "Now it only does more harm". In America atleast.
