I wasn't using it to validate ESP phil. I don't have access to that particular studies statistical analysis, nor would I enjoy analyzing that (but I'm sure you would). I was using that one partiicular study (I'm sure there are more, it was just a simple google high hitter) to support my assertion that statistiacally there is not zero evidence that ESP breaks probablity. That alone invalidates a materialistic 5 senses is all we need world view. It is a study that is also directly a counter to DT's comment "no evidence that there is anything at all to ESP" . I feel there is something more than the strict materialist 5 senses view. If that view were valid, studies like this wouldn't be possible.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari