RE: Trump on 60 Minutes
November 16, 2016 at 4:18 pm
(This post was last modified: November 16, 2016 at 4:22 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(November 16, 2016 at 4:05 pm)TaraJo Wrote: If everyone seems to agree with the idea that we should allow refugees in, what immigrants do we disagree about? Who shouldn't we let in?
It's not about not being allowed in. It's about going through a legal process (whatever it may be) to get here and stay here.
If someone comes here illegally but is a refugee, they can stay. If someone came here illegally years ago but has been well integrated, made a good life, has family, children, etc, they can stay. But if some dude who is not a refugee veers around the entry gate and crosses the desert/ocean/lake or whatever to get here, and gets caught in the process... yeah, take him back. If he wants to come, he can go through the legal process. What would even be the point of regulating our borders if we're just going to be like "You need these documents and you need to go through these gates to get here. But oh, you managed to get in without doing that? Ok, that's fine. You can stay." That is just not reasonable, folks.
As Abaris said. When it comes to illegals being here, it should be taken as a case by case basis. Not "they all need to go" and not "they all can stay so long as they are not criminals."
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
