RE: Question about the whole NDE concept and Dr. Jeffrey Long
November 17, 2016 at 2:03 am
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2016 at 2:06 am by robvalue.)
Welcome to the forum 
I remember reading there is a very good explanation for the "bright light" a lot of people see, but I can't remember where I read it.
Your brain hallucinates under extreme conditions. That seems to be the most likely explanation. As Alex said, we're all very similar so similar experiences aren't that surprising. Where details do come in, such as religious stuff, it tends to be the mythology the person has been most exposed to.
There's no need to make statements like, "Nothing else at all is going on here". Science doesn't work like that. Science deals with what we can test. If a coherent, testable hypothesis is formed regarding anything else that might be happening during these experiences, then people will be all over it I'm sure. But just reading anecdotes and coming to conclusions through those is hopelessly unreliable. It's well known the brain is not experiencing just real things already, at this stage.
Science doesn't "know everything", but that's not a license to make stuff up, as woo-style people tend to do. If their methods of finding out what they claim to know are rigorous, then they too are science.

I remember reading there is a very good explanation for the "bright light" a lot of people see, but I can't remember where I read it.
Your brain hallucinates under extreme conditions. That seems to be the most likely explanation. As Alex said, we're all very similar so similar experiences aren't that surprising. Where details do come in, such as religious stuff, it tends to be the mythology the person has been most exposed to.
There's no need to make statements like, "Nothing else at all is going on here". Science doesn't work like that. Science deals with what we can test. If a coherent, testable hypothesis is formed regarding anything else that might be happening during these experiences, then people will be all over it I'm sure. But just reading anecdotes and coming to conclusions through those is hopelessly unreliable. It's well known the brain is not experiencing just real things already, at this stage.
Science doesn't "know everything", but that's not a license to make stuff up, as woo-style people tend to do. If their methods of finding out what they claim to know are rigorous, then they too are science.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum