RE: Republicans... proudly marching into the 1950's
November 17, 2016 at 7:21 pm
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2016 at 7:26 pm by Aroura.)
No denying things based on religion or race, but sexual orientation and marital status, which still means nearly everyone.
So, if a doctor hates Muslims, for example, they can deny an unmarried Muslim man HIV treatment, citing this law. Just say it's about having premarital sex, not his religion, and bam.
Basically, only straight married monogamous people will be protected from discrimination. Everyone else is up for grabs, since we know most people do have premarital sex. And if you are stepping out on a spouse, it opens you up to discrimination action as well.
Let me know if I'm getting this wrong, but that is how it appears.
P.s. hillary haters please tell me again how she would have been equally bad??
So, if a doctor hates Muslims, for example, they can deny an unmarried Muslim man HIV treatment, citing this law. Just say it's about having premarital sex, not his religion, and bam.
Basically, only straight married monogamous people will be protected from discrimination. Everyone else is up for grabs, since we know most people do have premarital sex. And if you are stepping out on a spouse, it opens you up to discrimination action as well.
Let me know if I'm getting this wrong, but that is how it appears.
P.s. hillary haters please tell me again how she would have been equally bad??
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?”
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
