Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 4, 2025, 6:49 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
A discussion with tack

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
A discussion with tack
eric209 Offline
Newbie
*
Religious Views: Secular Humanist
Posts: 99
Threads: 7
Joined: June 3, 2011
Reputation: 2
#6
RE: A discussion with tack
June 13, 2011 at 2:17 am (This post was last modified: June 13, 2011 at 2:19 am by eric209.)
(June 13, 2011 at 2:10 am)Rayaan Wrote:
(June 13, 2011 at 12:49 am)eric209 Wrote: The very nature of Resurrection is illogical. Death has no logical reversal.

Yet system restore and reversible computations are logical? Tongue

Btw, I think that Ryft is the best theist for these kind of philosophical debates. I know that he has done this before with intelligent replies. But we'll see how it goes.

Please clarify your point. Are you equivocating death with computers? I can only understand your point if your are totally untrained in computing and assume the same of me.

EDIT: Are you assuming im a theist?
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
A discussion with tack

Messages In This Thread
A discussion with tack - by Zenith - June 11, 2011 at 8:03 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by Ryft - June 12, 2011 at 9:50 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by Zenith - June 21, 2011 at 1:44 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by Cinjin - June 12, 2011 at 10:27 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by eric209 - June 13, 2011 at 12:49 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by Rayaan - June 13, 2011 at 2:10 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by eric209 - June 13, 2011 at 2:17 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by Zenith - June 21, 2011 at 4:34 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by Rayaan - June 13, 2011 at 2:27 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by eric209 - June 13, 2011 at 2:46 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by Rayaan - June 13, 2011 at 2:54 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by eric209 - June 13, 2011 at 2:58 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by Ryft - June 13, 2011 at 11:18 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by eric209 - June 14, 2011 at 1:00 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by Ryft - June 14, 2011 at 2:53 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by leo-rcc - June 23, 2011 at 8:47 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by tackattack - June 22, 2011 at 6:19 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by Zenith - July 4, 2011 at 2:46 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by The Grand Nudger - July 4, 2011 at 3:21 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by Zenith - July 4, 2011 at 4:01 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by The Grand Nudger - July 4, 2011 at 5:38 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by Zenith - July 5, 2011 at 9:32 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by The Grand Nudger - July 5, 2011 at 10:27 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by Zenith - July 9, 2011 at 8:09 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by tackattack - July 6, 2011 at 7:05 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by Zenith - July 9, 2011 at 10:02 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by The Grand Nudger - July 6, 2011 at 8:49 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by reverendjeremiah - July 9, 2011 at 9:09 pm
RE: A discussion with tack - by The Grand Nudger - July 10, 2011 at 9:14 am
RE: A discussion with tack - by reverendjeremiah - July 10, 2011 at 12:28 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Reply to a Discussion Glitch 8 2558 June 28, 2013 at 7:24 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Feedback on discussion FallentoReason 28 12047 September 4, 2012 at 12:03 am
Last Post: FallentoReason
  A discussion around family table. Rwandrall 129 82248 May 27, 2010 at 5:40 pm
Last Post: Scented Nectar



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)