The Best Evidence For God and Against God

[Edwardo Piet]

The easiest and simplest way to prove God's existence is to provide evidence of its existence.

No.

But there is lot lot easier way to do it. Disapprove the theory of Naturalistic Evolution and this automatically Proves God's existence or Prove Evolution and you automatically disapprove God's existence.

No.

The two options.

A)Prove Naturalistic Evolution to be true and you take out God's existence because this shows a natural explanation of how everything came into existence without the assistance of the supernatural.
B)Take out Naturalistic Evolution and the existence of God is automatically Proven.

Nope.

Because it's either,

A):We came here by an accident without true meaning or purpose, but we are just some random living organism in space, Or
B):God created us with a meaning and purpose to life, not including our private wants.

Nah, false dichotomy.

But it also depends on ones honesty as well, not just the evidence, no amount of evidence is going to convince someone who is unwilling to accept it. So we must look at ii, in both ways.

Nope. Whether someone is convinced by an argument is entirely separate to whether they're honest about that acceptance or whether they live a lie and pretend to be unconvinced. Honesty is separate from belief. Honesty demonstrates what someone believes but dishonesty doesn't represent someone being unwilling to accept something because someone can accept something and pretend not to.

A) Is there convincing evidence for Naturalistic Evolution?
or
B) Is there convincing evidence against Naturalistic Evolution?

There is convincing evidence for naturalistic evolution.

When atheists say, the burden of Proof is on the theist to provide the evidence for Gods existence. There is a twist to the game you see, a theist may say the burden of Proof is on the atheist to provide proof of Naturalistic Evolution that we came into existence by an accident, see the problem? So, we must check both sides.

Nope. You're setting up a false dichotomy.