RE: ☢The Theistic Response➼ to Atheists saying, "It Doesn't mean God Did it"
November 19, 2016 at 2:10 pm
(This post was last modified: November 19, 2016 at 2:19 pm by The Joker.)
(November 19, 2016 at 12:54 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:If it can be proven that we didn't come here by an accident by mindless dumb products of evolution without meaning or purpose,
But you cannot do that.
Case dismissed.
Quote:The Joker Wrote:The burden of Proof is on the atheist to provide proof of Naturalistic Evolution that we came into existence by an accident.
The easiest and simplest way to prove God's existence is to provide evidence of its existence. But there is lot lot easier way to do it. Disapprove the theory of Naturalistic Evolution and this automatically Proves God's existence or Prove Evolution and you automatically disapprove God's existence.
The two options.
A)Prove Naturalistic Evolution to be true and you take out God's existence because this shows a natural explanation of how everything came into existence without the assistance of the supernatural.
B)Take out Naturalistic Evolution and the existence of God is automatically Proven.
Because it's either,
A):We came here by an accident without true meaning or purpose, but we are just some random living organism in space, Or
B):God created us with a meaning and purpose to life, not including our private wants.
But it also depends on ones honesty as well, not just the evidence, no amount of evidence is going to convince someone who is unwilling to accept it. So we must look at ii, in both ways.
A) Is there convincing evidence for Naturalistic Evolution?
or
B) Is there convincing evidence against Naturalistic Evolution?
When atheists say, the burden of Proof is on the theist to provide the evidence for Gods existence. There is a twist to the game you see, a theist may say the burden of Proof is on the atheist to provide proof of Naturalistic Evolution that we came into existence by an accident, see the problem? So, we must check both sides.
(November 19, 2016 at 2:10 pm)Jesster Wrote:(November 19, 2016 at 2:08 pm)The Joker Wrote: You gave no reason in the other threads, you just said it is wrong.
I'm talking about this thread, f******.
You repeated the same s**** in this thread that you've said before. You didn't need to open a new thread to keep the same conversation going.
Easy there with the insults I'm not offended and besides why get angry, doesn't this prove that you are being passionate to disapprove God's existence?
Again you proved no point, other than say it's flawed. Please demonstrate how?
The Ouji board is "a" prove of the spiritual realm. There's like hundreds of YouTube videos of people giving testimony that the Ouija Board really does work!