RE: ☢The Theistic Response➼ to Atheists saying, "It Doesn't mean God Did it"
November 19, 2016 at 4:31 pm
(This post was last modified: November 19, 2016 at 4:34 pm by Simon Moon.)
(November 19, 2016 at 3:42 pm)The Joker Wrote:(November 19, 2016 at 3:39 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Because you have no evidence for any invisible sky-daddies and your use of logic normally proceeds from the premise that god did x therefore......
When you have evidence, give us a call.
The cosmological argument is "a" evidence for God.
Rubbish.
A logical argument is not evidence for the existence of a god.
You can't 'logic' something into existence.
The CA commits several fallacies that make it invalid.
Usually, depending on the version of the CA, these fallacies are:
Affirming the consequent.
Fallacy of composition.
Fallacy of equivocation.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
