RE: ☢The Theistic Response➼ to Atheists saying, "It Doesn't mean God Did it"
November 19, 2016 at 6:01 pm
(This post was last modified: November 19, 2016 at 6:02 pm by The Joker.)
(November 19, 2016 at 5:44 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(November 19, 2016 at 5:09 pm)The Joker Wrote: Since we started with finches and the finches stayed finches, isn’t this just an example of variety within a kind?
Well sort of, so long as the kind in question is the living kind. Sea squirts become vertebrates over eons. Sea vertebrates become vertebrates of the land, air and canopy somewhat more quickly. And those of the canopy become those typing on keyboards. One living kind becomes what we call another living kind by adapting to ever changing environmental conditions. Nothing teleological about it, could definitely have been otherwise but boy what a story. But stick to your bible stories if you prefer those to the book of life unfolding all around you.
One of the most glaring problems with the evolutionary story of vertebrates is the lack of transitional forms. As in other fossil groups, major phyla appear abruptly and fully formed in the fossil record. Fact mutations aren't evolution. Is there any observed case where random chance events created complex molecules with enormous amounts of information like that found in DNA or RNA? If not, then why should we assume it happened in the past?
(November 19, 2016 at 5:45 pm)operator Wrote:(November 19, 2016 at 5:36 pm)The Joker Wrote: So you are a Theistic Satanist?
No, what makes you think that? I've never actually met or even heard of a person who says they're a theistic Satanist... I don't even think theistic Satanism is a thing.
Are you an atheistic Satanist?