(December 7, 2016 at 3:55 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(December 7, 2016 at 3:55 pm)Macoleco Wrote: Even if wallym is a sociopath, you would still need to attack his arguments, not him. Even if his logic is cold in your eyes, it may be correct. Specially since he has no emotional connection.
I am just saying... Not supporting wallym. I havent read what he has posted actually.
His argument is what? That morality is subjective?
If that's the case, I can't really make the argument that morality is objective without bringing God into the picture. So I'll leave it to others to debate his argument in a secular/philosophical way.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
