Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 24, 2025, 3:20 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Caesarian births directly affecting human evolution
#41
RE: Caesarian births directly affecting human evolution
(December 7, 2016 at 4:18 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:The apparently increasing prevalence of caring behavior for the incapacitated as humans evolved  suggested whether that particular band survived is a mere quibble.  That trait, survived and prospered.

I'm not convinced that it is a "trait" as much as a cultural phenomena which was itself an outgrowth of the development of language/symbolic thinking.  Again, where else does that appear in the natural world?  In this humans are quite unique... not because of some stupid god story!

I am not sure we are that unique.  When you break it down, what we do is we tend to conduct ourselves towards crippled or dead members of social group that appear to damage the interests of the living members.   Elephants seem to exhibit similar behavior over crippled or dead herd mates that couldn't possibly contribute to the survival of the living members.  But the key thing is evolution does not act right off the bat with surgical precision.  The behavior in question may well have considerable benefit when undertaken upon living members of the social group who would soon fully recover.  However evolution is not so precise as to immediate confer upon us the instinctive ability to recognize the boundaries of where such behavior stops being advantageous.

So we gained the instinct to care for the crippled regardless of whether they would soon fully recover.  Natural selection would then weigh the overall consequences to determine whether the harm in caring for the permanently crippled outweigh the benefit of caring for the soon to recover.   If it does, then there might be strong selection pressure to terminate the gene for this behavior, or force modification of the gene to also confer the instincts to more sharply delineate where and when such behavior manifest itself.    Iffy does not, then there is less pressure to refine the precision of the this behavior.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Caesarian births directly affecting human evolution - by deleteduser12345 - December 6, 2016 at 1:01 pm
RE: Caesarian births directly affecting human evolution - by Anomalocaris - December 7, 2016 at 5:57 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works QuackeryDetection 58 9595 May 17, 2022 at 3:17 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Bug Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution, It Never Happe QuackeryDetection 11 2442 May 14, 2022 at 9:19 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Disbelief in human evolution linked to racism & prejudice Fake Messiah 61 8654 April 7, 2022 at 12:28 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. Mystic 59 34369 April 6, 2013 at 5:12 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Your inner fish, free powerpoint presentations on human evolution. leo-rcc 0 2091 December 23, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Last Post: leo-rcc
  Scientists Extract Images Directly From Brain Kyuuketsuki 20 10896 December 18, 2008 at 5:16 am
Last Post: Kyuuketsuki



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)