RE: Nice. Too Bad the FBI
December 17, 2016 at 5:09 pm
(This post was last modified: December 17, 2016 at 5:13 pm by scoobysnack.)
Seems to me the left is really just trying to place the blame on Russia in an attempt to deligitimize the fact Trump won. First Clinton had her staff smash their computers with hammers to avoid having them turned over in the investigation. Then wikileaks came on the scene. They said the emails were fake and not to look at them. Then they said their emails were stolen and private property and not to pay attention to what they said. Then they said they were real, and that the Russians hacked the DNC to steal the election from Hillary and that it was decided based on what was revealed by wikileaks. How about Clinton was a horrible candidate that no one really liked! People loved Trump. Those who supported Clinton didn't really like her but liked her better than Trump. She had no crowds at her rallys and just came across as fake.
Just another source:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-tr...SKBN14204E
Assange has said Russia was not the source of the leaks, although he's not saying who his sources are.
Plus there is also the former ambassador who works with wikileaks who says his source was not Russian, but pissed off people in the DNC
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/compu...aks-source
"A former British ambassador who is now an operative for WikiLeaks says that the leaked DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails and documents were not hacked by the Russian government, as claimed by the CIA. In fact, he says the leaked documents were not hacked at all. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks,” former ambassador Craig Murray said in a recent interview with the Daily Mail."
That's basically the info I had. These leaks came from within the US from DNC operatives that were pissed about corruption which led to the demise of the chair woman Debbie Wasserman schultz. Plus those in the ranks of various US intel agencies who were sick of the corruption leaked info as well.
I'm posting this again, because no one ever comments on what is said in this. This is a guy who overthrew the soviet union and worked psychological operations for the US state dept talking about the plan to leak info to wiki leaks. He is the guy the Jack Ryan movie is based off. A true spook, and is showing his face for the first time in 20 years. I'm curious what people think of this, and why the left isn't making this go viral:
Just another source:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-tr...SKBN14204E
Assange has said Russia was not the source of the leaks, although he's not saying who his sources are.
Plus there is also the former ambassador who works with wikileaks who says his source was not Russian, but pissed off people in the DNC
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/compu...aks-source
"A former British ambassador who is now an operative for WikiLeaks says that the leaked DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails and documents were not hacked by the Russian government, as claimed by the CIA. In fact, he says the leaked documents were not hacked at all. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks,” former ambassador Craig Murray said in a recent interview with the Daily Mail."
That's basically the info I had. These leaks came from within the US from DNC operatives that were pissed about corruption which led to the demise of the chair woman Debbie Wasserman schultz. Plus those in the ranks of various US intel agencies who were sick of the corruption leaked info as well.
I'm posting this again, because no one ever comments on what is said in this. This is a guy who overthrew the soviet union and worked psychological operations for the US state dept talking about the plan to leak info to wiki leaks. He is the guy the Jack Ryan movie is based off. A true spook, and is showing his face for the first time in 20 years. I'm curious what people think of this, and why the left isn't making this go viral:
