(December 22, 2016 at 9:27 pm)paulpablo Wrote:(December 22, 2016 at 8:43 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: At the time that post was made, it was only an assumption. Do you need everything explained to you?
You're going to cause a smug epidemic in the forum soon. Thick bellowing clouds of smug.
Yes high and mighty one, you need to explain your perspective to me and I need to explain my perspective to you if we have a disagreement.
I can't read your mind.
Now what I'm going to explain to you is that in my first post where I declared this person to be a Tunisian Muslim I followed it up with telling you that I've already seen several sources going into detail about the connections he has to Islamic terrorists, preachers so and and so forth.
So me saying he's a Muslim isn't without evidence and isn't an assumption.
And this was at the time the post was made, I had already seen in the news this person has links to Islamic Muslim preachers and Islamic Muslim terrorist organisations.
Pity you couldn't take the time to link that news so the readership could assay the source. I'm sure it was reputable, but no doubt others might wish to read for themselves.
Now what I'm going to explain to you is that my point is that your assumptions reveal a lot about yourself, whether or not you realize that. You can cry all you wish about "PC!" but your assumptions mark you.
Your assumption was correct? That still doesn't give it the patina of reason.
Of course, you have to think to understand that much. Good luck on that score, and forgive my pessimism. I simply don't think you're up to it.
