(December 23, 2016 at 12:15 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I would advise you to look into the difference between the present-tense and past-tense verbs, because as I've already made clear, you're harboring butthurt about a comment I made over twenty hours ago about assumptions even as in the interim I've already acknowledged the facts on the ground directly to you.
You're either spoiling for an argument, or woefully dull.
(December 23, 2016 at 12:11 am)paulpablo Wrote: Will the next post be where you claim to be too smart to argue with me and give up?
lol, you should be so lucky!
Right so explain what you mean.
I thought that when you said the thought he's a Muslim remains an assumption that you mean't the thought he's a Muslim remains an assumption, I don't know what other way to take it.
And that kind of sounds condecending because I'm basically saying I thought you meant what you said, because it's right there in black and white but I don't know how else to put it across to you.
At the time it wasn't an assumption because at the time I made the comment he's a Muslim there was already evidence pointing to him being a Muslim.
It wasn't an assumption then, not an assumption now, past tense, present tense, future tense, I wouldn't have thought whatever tense was used was of any importance.
If I said he's a baker, and then you say the thought he's a baker is an assumption. Then I reply with no, my friends have already told me he's a baker. Then it doesn't really matter what tense is being used in any sentence I would have thought.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
