(December 27, 2016 at 1:19 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:(December 26, 2016 at 1:15 pm)AAA Wrote: Define 'define' so that I know what definitions count. Also please define 'rigorously' so I can meet that criterion. I'm joking of course. Maybe instead of getting hung up on the quality of the definitions (which I did provide), maybe deal with the concept of the argument.
So you have two definitions, both of which refer to teleological metaphors which implicitly imply that the article is designed. You might as well have just skipped the argument and declared, "They're designed because I say they are." Your definitions of information and specified don't point to anything concrete that can be identified purely from a description of the thing you're referring to. Your definitions are too high level to be of use for anything beyond cloaking your assumptions.
My bold.
AAA, son, right here is where Jorg handed you your ass. Please take it with you when you go back to bible camp.
