Is atheism a scientific perspective?

[brewer]

Then describe your "design" in detail that does not involve supernatural magic. Stop trying to poke holes in other theories and provide your theory. 

Or is your theory just "poof, god"? No further explanation needed.

How about He used various organic chemical reactions to develop amino acids and nucleotides. He then added them to a solution in sequence and ligated them together by heating them as they were added. Once He created the sequence of nucleotides, He created the enzymes necessary to maintain it. He then created the phospholipid bilayer, the golgi, the ER, the RER, the nucleus, and all these other things using chemical techniques and a plan. 

Obviously this is speculation, but the point is that intelligence directing the specific organization of the cell is more likely to me than it slowly forming over billions of years of reproduction.

You must be studying biology/biochemistry as this seems to be the only area of science that you are putting forth for ID. Can you speak to the rest of the ID universe with the same or similar points/specificity?

Can you tell me how your speculation with out detail is "more likely"? Or is that your specific slant of speculation as well. Evolution has support, your's has woo. And why to you keep using the pronoun "He"?

Look, I really don't care. If you're more comfortable with some unseen magic biochemist then fine. I'm just not going to buy it. I'm OK with science and the fact that we may not have all of the specific answers. It only means that we don't have all of the specific answers "yet". 

BTW, be sure and thank god for cancer. The ability of a cell to loose apoptosis was pure genius.