(December 27, 2016 at 3:14 pm)AAA Wrote:(December 27, 2016 at 2:34 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Just so you know...this is like the 5th time we've been around and around with this guy over ID in the past year or so. He's not new here, which I think can explain much of the scorn you are seeing here.
I'm not really bothered or surprised by the hateful nature of the comments. I'm disappointed that the hateful comments are basically what you come to when you don't want to address the argument. Specifically you LadyforCamus just insult. You have never attempted to deal with the argument. It's hard to argue with atheists considering that so many of you are unwilling to consider anyone else worthy of your precious intellect.
(December 27, 2016 at 3:12 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Sure sounds like argument from ignorance, or argument from personal incredulity to me.
Please let us know how you eliminated every possible natural mechanism...
That's what the word known is there for.
Oh, I most certainly have! As I said...go back and re-read through the endless pages of your own past threads, and perhaps refresh your memory.
It's as I said before: the ID "argument" is NOT an argument. You have never once produced a shred of evidence demonstrating the mechanisms by which your designer has accomplished his design, not to mention an explanation for who or what this designer is, and by what facts and evidence you came to those conclusions. When you can bring those things to the table, you have an argument for which I may choose to participate in. Until then, I'm not going to waste time pointing out fallacies that have been pointed out to you time and time again.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
