RE: Strong and Weak Arguments
December 30, 2016 at 2:09 pm
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2016 at 2:15 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(December 30, 2016 at 11:35 am)Rhythm Wrote: "Who created god" is an academic nail in the coffin to a particular argument, but it's not compelling to you, whereas others find it to be so.....It's not compelling because it's stupid. It's like asking "what is the cause of the cause that has no cause?" or, more precisely, "what made the thing without any prior potential actualize the potential it never had?"
(December 30, 2016 at 11:35 am)Rhythm Wrote: "God's and unicorns" doesn't express any obvious category error...it only expresses your subjective valuation of unicorns respective to gods.It doesn't take a genius to understand that mythological creatures would be found inside of and be part of physical reality whereas, if God is the creator of physical reality then He couldn't be inside of or part of it. Duh!