(January 1, 2017 at 8:44 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote:(January 1, 2017 at 7:32 pm)Godschild Wrote: I explained clearly in other post on this thread how some animals preserve their environment which in turn helps the rest of the enviroment.I didn't say your explanations were not clear. They are perfectly clear. I said your conclusion does not follow (non sequitur). The two plus two part is clear. It's when you say it equals five that I have to object.
GC
(January 1, 2017 at 8:19 pm)Astonished Wrote: ...Wait, so this somehow disproves evolution? Was I standing too close to someone who was smoking something?
Aw, you've met one of my favorites, good ol' GC. And now you have entered the Twilight Zone. Give him a brush and he'll paint himself into a corner where he has nothing legitimate to say. Then he'll show his unassailable repertoire of classic fallacies,
Ah, so it's not meant to be taken seriously. I was kind of worried there for a second. Not worried that evolution was false, but that something in my environment was impairing me. Good to know it was just a misunderstanding.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
