Real peer review: a paper is submitted for publication in a reputable journal and immediately torn apart, atom by atom, by rival scientists looking for the slightest flaw so as to correct them and add to their scientific reputation.
IDiotic / cretinist peer review: a sermon is printed in a journal set up specifically to publish cretinist sermons. This leads to a group of wannabe ministers and preachers giving each other handjobs in a desperate bid to con the sheep into believing they have some scientific credibility. The closest the process might ever get to real peer review is making sure that the sermons are as close to the predetermined conclusion (that the bible/kerrang is revealed truth) as possible.
It's cargo cult science, by people who have a vested interest in making you think they actually have merit. Don't feed them your time, and especially not your money.
IDiotic / cretinist peer review: a sermon is printed in a journal set up specifically to publish cretinist sermons. This leads to a group of wannabe ministers and preachers giving each other handjobs in a desperate bid to con the sheep into believing they have some scientific credibility. The closest the process might ever get to real peer review is making sure that the sermons are as close to the predetermined conclusion (that the bible/kerrang is revealed truth) as possible.
It's cargo cult science, by people who have a vested interest in making you think they actually have merit. Don't feed them your time, and especially not your money.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
