(January 2, 2017 at 2:36 am)Godschild Wrote:(January 1, 2017 at 8:19 pm)Astonished Wrote: ...Wait, so this somehow disproves evolution? Was I standing too close to someone who was smoking something?
I didn't say it disproves anything that is what everyone is saying I stated.
GC
(January 1, 2017 at 8:44 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: I didn't say your explanations were not clear. They are perfectly clear. I said your conclusion does not follow (non sequitur). The two plus two part is clear. It's when you say it equals five that I have to object.
Actually you would disagree with me even if I said you are real.
GC
Okay, now I see what she meant about you being one of her favorites.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
