(January 1, 2017 at 9:19 pm)Tonus Wrote:(January 1, 2017 at 7:46 pm)AAA Wrote: People are doing it. Read some of the peer-reviewed books by the ID community.
I am referring to peer-reviewed articles in scientific journals, not books or articles that are reviewed by fellow ID proponents in ID journals and not submitted to mainstream scientific publications. If they're submitting to traditional peer-review then it doesn't matter if they are religious fanatics or if I ignore them-- their work would be part of the record and they would be making progress in re-shaping or overturning the theory of evolution. If they're shielding their work from legitimate peer-review, why shouldn't I ignore them?
You act as though all ideas are treated the same by scientific journals. Like everything else, they put money first. Ideas (and even empirical findings) with implications that the society likes will be more likely to receive publication than an idea or empirical finding that the society does not like. ID doesn't get published often (they do have some published articles) largely because the scientific community is largely biased toward materialism. I think it is foolish to think that all results (let's assume results with the same p value) are treated equally by the scientific journals.
Do you ignore everything that isn't peer reviewed?
