(January 9, 2017 at 8:22 pm)operator Wrote: to OP
probably because jesus never existed. The proof for the existence of a "Jesus of Nazareth," is shaky at best.
Problem is, the historians have not reached a consensus on really any of the details surrounding this man. Some historians believe that Jesus was actually a common name then and the Bible actually refers to several different people as jesus throughout the Old Testament. All of this stuff is so loose and undefined that who the fuck knows what the truth is.
Even if Jesus did exist? So what? That is honestly my biggest point.
It looks like Nazareth never existed too! At least it wasn't inhabited as a town or city at the supposed time of Jeebus. If he did exist, he should have been called "Jesus of Nowhere". I have been looking at Rene Salm's articles and Youtubes lately and they are very convincing. Who would have thought that biblical archaeology and multi-million dollar pilgrim tourist trade is all BS?